Actualité climatique du mois passé dans laquelle j'entrepose pêle-mêle les articles que j'ai trouvés intéressants (mais j'ai pu, et dû, en louper un certain nombre) ; comme je n'ai pas toute la journée à dédier à la tenue de ce blog je me dispenserai de traduire les articles en français, à chacun donc de se débrouiller avec la langue de Shakespeare en fonction de ses capacités (il y a au demeurant des outils de traduction en ligne assez performants...) ; cependant vous pouvez utiliser l'outil de traduction que Blogger met à votre disposition et que vous trouverez dans le bandeau de droite :
*****
Janvier 2018 : Decadal forecast
metoffice.gov.uk
Forecast issued in January 2018. The forecast will next be updated in January 2019. Further discussion and background information can be found in this research news article.
*****
Abstract
Abstract
*****
Sélectionnez d'abord l'anglais si le français n'apparait pas :
Le texte sera alors intégralement traduit en anglais :
Il vous suffira alors de sélectionner le français :
Et tout le texte sera intégralement traduit en français.
Il vous suffira alors de sélectionner le français :
*****
Forecast issued in January 2018. The forecast will next be updated in January 2019. Further discussion and background information can be found in this research news article.
*****
Le 12/02/2018 : Climate-change–driven accelerated sea-level rise detected in the altimeter era
Abstract
Using a 25-y time series of precision satellite altimeter data from TOPEX/Poseidon, Jason-1, Jason-2, and Jason-3, we estimate the climate-change–driven acceleration of global mean sea level over the last 25 y to be 0.084 ± 0.025 mm/y2. Coupled with the average climate-change–driven rate of sea level rise over these same 25 y of 2.9 mm/y, simple extrapolation of the quadratic implies global mean sea level could rise 65 ± 12 cm by 2100 compared with 2005, roughly in agreement with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) 5th Assessment Report (AR5) model projections.
*****
Le 2/02/2018 : High-energy, high-fat lifestyle challenges an Arctic apex predator, the polar bear science.sciencemag.org
Abstract
Regional declines in polar bear (Ursus maritimus) populations have been attributed to changing sea ice conditions, but with limited information on the causative mechanisms. By simultaneously measuring field metabolic rates, daily activity patterns, body condition, and foraging success of polar bears moving on the spring sea ice, we found that high metabolic rates (1.6 times greater than previously assumed) coupled with low intake of fat-rich marine mammal prey resulted in an energy deficit for more than half of the bears examined. Activity and movement on the sea ice strongly influenced metabolic demands. Consequently, increases in mobility resulting from ongoing and forecasted declines in and fragmentation of sea ice are likely to increase energy demands and may be an important factor explaining observed declines in body condition and survival.
*****
*****
*****
*****
Le 13/02/2018 : Increased West Antarctic and unchanged East Antarctic ice discharge over the last 7years
Abstract.
Ice discharge from large ice sheets plays a direct role in determining rates of sea-level rise. We map present day Antarctic-wide surface velocities using Landsat 7 and 8 imagery spanning 2013–2015 and compare to earlier estimates derived from synthetic aperture radar, revealing heterogeneous changes in ice flow since ∼2008.The new mapping provides complete coastal and inland coverage of ice velocity north of 82.4◦S with a mean error of <10myr−1, resulting from multiple overlapping image pairs acquired during the daylight period. Using an optimized flux gate, ice discharge from Antarctica is 1929±40 Gigatons per year (Gtyr−1) in 2015, an increase of 36±15Gtyr−1 from the time of the radar mapping. Flow accelerations across the grounding lines of West Antarctica’s Amundsen Sea Embayment, Getz Ice Shelf and Marguerite Bay on the western Antarctic Peninsula, account for 88% of this increase. In contrast, glaciers draining the East Antarctic Ice Sheet have been remarkably constant over the period of observation. Including modeled rates of snow accumulation and basal melt, the Antarctic ice sheet lost ice at an average rate of 183±94Gtyr−1 between 2008 and 2015. The modest increase in ice discharge over the past 7 years is contrasted by high rates of ice sheet mass loss and distinct spatial patters of elevation lowering. The West Antarctic Ice Sheet is experiencing high rates of mass loss and displays distinct patterns of elevation lowering that point to a dynamic imbalance. We find modest increase in ice discharge over the past 7 years, which suggests that the recent pattern of mass loss in Antarctica is part of a longer-term phase of enhanced glacier flow initiated in the decades leading up to the first continent-wide radar mapping of ice flow.
Le 20/02/2018 : Committed sea-level rise under the Paris Agreement and the legacy of delayed mitigation action
Abstract.
Sea-level rise is a major consequence of climate change that will continue long after emissions of greenhouse gases have stopped. The 2015 Paris Agreement aims at reducing climate-related risks by reducing greenhouse gas emissions to net zero and limiting global-mean temperature increase. Here we quantify the effect of these constraints on global sea-level rise until 2300, including Antarctic ice-sheet instabilities. We estimate median sea-level rise between 0.7 and 1.2 m, if net-zero greenhouse gas emissions are sustained until 2300, varying with the pathway of emissions during this century. Temperature stabilization below 2 °C is insufficient to hold median sea-level rise until 2300 below 1.5 m. We find that each 5-year delay in near-term peaking of CO2 emissions increases median year 2300 sea-level rise estimates by ca. 0.2 m, and extreme sea-level rise estimates at the 95th percentile by up to 1 m. Our results underline the importance of near-term mitigation action for limiting long-term sea-level rise risks.
Response of the sea-level contributors to net-zero CO2 scenarios. Time series of the sea-level responses of thermal expansion a, mountain glaciers b, Greenland mass balance c, and Antarctic mass balance d. Sea-level rise is in cm and relative to the year 2000. Colors refer to peak years as in Fig. 1. Shadings show the central 90th percentile range |
Le 21/02/2018 : Europe’s cities face more extreme weather than previously thought
The research, by Newcastle University, UK, has for the first time analysed changes in flooding, droughts and heatwaves for all European cities using all climate models.
Published today in the academic journal Environmental Research Letters, the study shows:
- a worsening of heatwaves for all 571 cities
- increasing drought conditions, particularly in southern Europe
- an increase in river flooding, especially in north-western European cities
- for the worst projections, increases in all hazards for most European cities
- Cork, Derry, Waterford, Wrexham, Carlisle, Glasgow, Chester and Aberdeen could be the worst hit cities in the British Isles for river flooding
- Even in the lowest case scenario, 85% of UK cities with a river are predicted to face increased river flooding
“Although southern European regions are adapted to cope with droughts, this level of change could be beyond breaking point,” Dr Selma Guerreiro, lead author, explains.
*****
ENSO
Le 27/02/2018 : climate.gov/enso
La Niña remains in place, but a wave of warm water spreading eastward beneath the surface is a sign of weakening. The dryness across the southern U.S. is consistent with average La Niña conditions. There is a 55% chance that conditions will return to neutral by the March-May season. The next update will be on March 8.
Visualisation du phénomène ENSO sur le Pacifique Est en décembre 2017. |
*****
GISS L-OTI anomalies de températures vs 1951-1980
27/02/2018 : data.giss.nasa.gov
Note: Gray areas signify missing data. Note: Ocean data are not used over land nor within 100km of a reporting land station. |
Temperature anomalies of January 2018 according to latitude. |
*****
Data Snapshots
27/02/2018 : climate.gov
climate-change-global-temperature
climate-change-global-temperature
Average surface temperature in 2016 compared to the 1981-2010 average. NOAA Climate.gov map, adapted from Plate 2.1a in State of the Climate in 2016. |
History of Global Surface temperature since 1880 source noaa |
Atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations in parts per million (ppm) for the past 800,000 years, based on EPICA (ice core) data. The peaks and valleys in carbon dioxide levels track the coming and going of ice ages (low carbon dioxide) and warmer interglacials (higher levels). Throughout these cycles, atmospheric carbon dioxide was never higher than 300 ppm; in 2016, it reached 402.9 ppm (black dot). NOAA Climate.gov, based on EPICA Dome C data (Lüthi, D., et al., 2008) provided by NOAA NCEI Paleoclimatology Program. |
|
This graph ( data source ) shows average area covered by snow in the Northern Hemisphere During March and April as the difference from the 1981-2010 average. |
This graph shows monthly gains of the Oceanic Niño Index from 1970 through present. |
*****
Coral Reef Watch
27/02/2018 : coralreefwatch.noaa.gov
This Figure shows the regions Currently experiencing high levels of heat stress causes coral bleaching That Cdn. |
*****
Climate Prediction Center
27/02/2018 : cpc.ncep.noaa.gov
Global Tropics Benefits / Hazards |
|
||
|
*****
Polar Science Center
27/02/2018 : psc.apl.uw.edu
The year 2017 finished out with an annually averaged sea ice volume that was the lowest on record with 12,900 km 3 , below 2012 for which the annually averaged volume was 13,500 km3 . This was even though extent and sea ice thickness were at record lows during the early months of 2017 but anomalously little melt for the recent years (Fig 8), brought the ice volume back above record levels.
Average Arctic sea ice volume in January 2018 was 16,000 km3 . This value is 1400 km3 above the previous January record that was set in 2017 with 14,600 km3 and similar to January volumes seen in 2011, 2012 and 2013. January 2018 ice volume was 42% below the maximum in 1979 and 27% below the mean value for 1979-2017. January 2018 ice volume sits right on the long term trend line.
Ice volume was up from the 2017 January minimum despite the fact that January 2018 sea ice extent is tracking near record lows. This is because ice thickness according to PIOMAS is up from 2017 by about 0.12 m.
Ice thickness anomalies for January 2018 relative to 2011-2017 (Fig 6) are positive in the East Siberian Sea and negative in much of the rest of the Arctic. Increased sea ice thickness in the East Siberian Sea is largely due to anomalous sea ice motion (Fig 7.) that likely transported more than normal amounts of sea ice into the East Siberian Sea. A similar pattern of ice thickness anomalies is apparent from CryoSat 2 with thicker sea ice along the Russian side of the Arctic. However, CryoSat 2 (AWI) has sea ice volume at about the same level as 2017.
The year 2017 finished out with an annually averaged sea ice volume that was the lowest on record with 12,900 km 3 , below 2012 for which the annually averaged volume was 13,500 km3 . This was even though extent and sea ice thickness were at record lows during the early months of 2017 but anomalously little melt for the recent years (Fig 8), brought the ice volume back above record levels.
Average Arctic sea ice volume in January 2018 was 16,000 km3 . This value is 1400 km3 above the previous January record that was set in 2017 with 14,600 km3 and similar to January volumes seen in 2011, 2012 and 2013. January 2018 ice volume was 42% below the maximum in 1979 and 27% below the mean value for 1979-2017. January 2018 ice volume sits right on the long term trend line.
Ice volume was up from the 2017 January minimum despite the fact that January 2018 sea ice extent is tracking near record lows. This is because ice thickness according to PIOMAS is up from 2017 by about 0.12 m.
Ice thickness anomalies for January 2018 relative to 2011-2017 (Fig 6) are positive in the East Siberian Sea and negative in much of the rest of the Arctic. Increased sea ice thickness in the East Siberian Sea is largely due to anomalous sea ice motion (Fig 7.) that likely transported more than normal amounts of sea ice into the East Siberian Sea. A similar pattern of ice thickness anomalies is apparent from CryoSat 2 with thicker sea ice along the Russian side of the Arctic. However, CryoSat 2 (AWI) has sea ice volume at about the same level as 2017.
Figure 8 Comparison of Daily Sea Ice Volume anomalies relative to 1979-2016. |
Fig. 2 Total Arctic sea ice volume from PIOMAS showing the volume of the mean annual cycle, and from 2010-2018. Shaded areas indicate one and two standard deviations from the mean. |
Fig.3 Monthly Sea Ice Volume from PIOMAS for April and Sep |
Fig 6. PIOMAS Ice Thickness Anomaly for January 2018 relative to 2011-2017. |
*****
Arctic Data archive system (ADS)
*****
Le consensus est une légende, ce graphique en est la preuve ! |
La meilleure façon de lutter contre le réchauffement climatique c'est encore de faire disparaître tout ce qui l'évoque. |
Moi d'abord, mes petits-enfants j'en ai rien à faire (traduction libre) |
Même les marmottes font l'autruche. |
Nos investissements détruisent peut-être la planète, mais...nous en avons besoin pour sauvegarder votre avenir ! |
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire